The academic article corresponding to your request is “Latent Securitisation of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia,” published in Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional by the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at Universitas Indonesia.
Below is an overview article summarizing the core findings, framework, and policy implications detailed in this research paper.
Protecting the Archipelago: Understanding the Latent Securitisation of IUU Fishing in Indonesia
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing poses a severe threat to maritime nations worldwide. For Indonesia—the world’s largest archipelagic state—the stakes are uniquely high. Millions of citizens rely on marine ecosystems for food and livelihood, making protecting territorial waters a matter of survival.
A seminal research paper published via the Universitas Indonesia Research Portal, titled “Latent Securitisation of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing in Indonesia,” explores how the country handles this critical threat. The study introduces a compelling conceptual angle: the transition from traditional military defense to contemporary maritime security through the lens of latent securitisation. The Framework: What is Latent Securitisation?
In international relations, “securitisation theory” (pioneered by the Copenhagen School) explains how a state elevates a regular political issue into an existential threat. Once an issue is “securitised,” the government can justify using extraordinary measures to neutralize it.
However, Indonesia’s approach to IUU fishing falls into a unique sub-category: latent securitisation.
The Concept: Rather than managing a constant, active emergency, the state builds a permanent, underlying legal and institutional framework designed to treat maritime poaching as an inherent danger.
The Pivot: This shifts the problem away from a basic resource management issue handled by local fisheries into a multi-sector national security imperative. Moving Beyond Traditional Security
Historically, international security focused purely on military-on-military conflicts. The Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional article emphasizes that modern geopolitical threats are multidimensional. IUU fishing in Indonesia damages the state across five core areas:
Economic Deprivation: Stalling domestic economic growth due to billions of dollars in stolen marine assets.
Environmental Degradation: Destroying fragile coral reefs and depleting fish stocks via destructive, unregulated catching methods.
Societal Instability: Threatening the food security and financial survival of vulnerable traditional coastal communities.
Sovereignty Infringement: Challenging state authority when foreign vessels breach the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). From Framework to Action: Policy Implications
By implementing a latent securitisation posture, Indonesia ensures that its navy, coast guard (Bakamla), and the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) maintain a united, high-alert stance. The paper illustrates that this institutional arrangement allows for rapid mobilization when incursions spike, without requiring the state to continuously declare diplomatic emergencies.
Ultimately, the research highlights that safeguarding the ocean requires an ongoing, structural synthesis of law enforcement, environmental policy, and geopolitical deterrence.
If you want to delve deeper into the specific sections of this research paper, tell me if you would like me to:
Outline the methodology used by the authors to track maritime data.
Summarize the historical policy shifts under different Indonesian presidential administrations.
Compare this paper with other maritime security articles from Scholar Hub Universitas Indonesia. Scholar Hub Universitas Indonesia